Internet Job Placement review of Red Flags

Have you run across the site If so, you might want to read this Internet Job Placement review of red flags. Here they are:

Red Flag #1) Internet Job Placement states:

“If You Have 60 Minutes A Day, Here’s A Certified, Proven And Guaranteed Way To Make $225 And More Every Day… The Easy Way… From Home!”

First of all, what exactly is a “certified” way to make money from home? And how exactly is it “proven and guaranteed”? Plus the $225 amount is completely randomly, made-up number. Why? because the business earnings develop from commissions and they’ve got no clue what products you’re going to be advertising and marketing or simply those items’ commission amounts.

Red Flag #2) The very top of tells you the product creator’s name is Michelle Miller, has an image of “Michelle Miller” and a “talking video” of “Michelle Miller”. Of course the Michelle Miller name is completely made up and the person talking on the page is a paid actor.

Red Flag #3) Utilization of substitute testimonial pictures. StayAtHomeIncome states in their disclaimers towards the end:

“For purpose of family privacy, testimonial pictures have been adapted and results may vary.”

Although testimonials used on could be authentic, it’s worthwhile to keep in mind that numerous internet sites began using this type of language for the reason that were getting outed by means of Federal Law Enforcement in addition to consumer protection sites for utilizing stock photos inside their testimonies.

Red Flag #4) Utilizing paid testimonials from others. A different legal disclaimer states:

“All testimonials have been remunerated.”

Bizarrely, the disclaimer also says, “± Images have been renumerated and are not common.” whatever that means.

Red Flag #5) Internet Job Placement states that you’ll “get a free one-on-one phone consultation with a Search Engine Agent Advisor to discuss your individual goals and map out and ensure your quick path to financial success.”

More often than not this type of 100 % freeAssistanceis used as a ploy to allow them to get you to communicate to a sales rep that will try to pressure you straight to spending cash on higher priced items you don’t really need or possibly that are of dubious quality.

Red Flag #6) Incredibly bizarre banner referencing “Search Partners”

The  Stay At Home Income Website has a banner which lists the following companies as “Search Partners”:

  • Ask
  • Bing
  • Google
  • Miva
  • MSN
  • Yahoo

The banner makes  NO sense in the context of the InternetJobPlacement site. As a matter of fact, the only way it COULD make any sense at all is if InteretJobPlacement purchased advertising through those specific companies – or if they possibly sold the services of those companies….both of which ANYBODY could do.

Those are issues I definitely hope you’ll give thought if you are considering buying this product.

If You're Struggling To Make Money Online - Click Here And FINALLY Get Answers To All Of Your Questions About Making Money Online

Automated Wealth Package review of red flags

The Automated Wealth Package sales page looks very similar to many other question sites that WorkAtHomeTruth has previously reviewed.  However, even though that might potentially indicate that the Automated Wealth Package should be something you should avoid, I still like to go other over other potential red flags before making a final decision like that.

So this Automated Wealth Package review of red flags does exactly that. Here are the red flags that I see.

Red Flag #1: Automated Wealth Package uses questionable testimonial photos

Currently AutomatedWealthPackage shows 3 testimonials. At least one photo can be found on iStockPhoto:

  • Click here to see the stock photo uses for “Jane & Jeremy C “

You should note that Automated Wealth Package states WAY at the bottom of the page that “Photos used are Not of actual customers.”

Most people will never notice that because of the GIANT yellow arrow blocking that information.

Automated Wealth Package review of questionable “As Seen On” claim using an image like this:

Automated Wealth Package review of

Automated Wealth Package review of "As Seen On TV" claim

Automated Wealth Package “As Seen On”?

What you need to know is that this “As Seen On” image is completely meaningless. Why? Because ANYBODY can BUY advertising on sites associated with these companies and claim to have been “seen on” them.  Therefore as it stands the claim that Automated Wealth Package has been “seen on” CNBC, USA Today, abc, Twitter, CNN, and AOL is completely meaningless and should be completely ignored.

You may have also noted the strange fact that has placed an asterisk next to the “AS SEEN ON”…but there is NOTHING that the asterisk actually refers to.

Automated Wealth Package Proudly (And Deceptively) Declares That It Was “Voted #1″ by Entrepreneur Magazine

I don’t know about you, but I’m willing to bet a ton of money that good ol’ Automated Wealth Package was NEVER “Voted #1″ by Entrepreneur Magazine or any other REAL business magazine whatsoever.  Or maybe waht Automated Wealth Package was “Voted #1″ for was the #1 product to completely AVOID.

Automated Wealth Package May Be Violating The Federal Trade Commissions No Safe Harbor rules

A quick review of the the testimonial by “Shelly” potentially violates the Federal Trade Commission’s No Safe Harbor rule. The testimonial shows Shelley as saying:

“After earning 362 in my week and 507 in my second I’m so pleased I made the right decision to join.”

A review of the testimonial allegedly from “Jane & Jeremy C” stating, “we finally got Porsche we always wanted. “

And a review of the testimonial allegedly from Lindsay as saying, “I’m earning more in a day than what I was earning in a week in my last job”.

David C. Vladeck – Director, FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection has stated:

“…the use of a disclaimer such as “results not typical” is no longer a safe harbor for the claims made in testimonials. Third, while you may use atypical or best-case testimonials, if you do, you should clearly and conspicuously disclose the generally expected
results consumers can expect in the depicted circumstances. Of course, the best practice, and the less risky practice, is to use testimonials that actually reflect what your product or services is likely to deliver. In other words, rather than run ads that give with one hand but take away with the other, it would be better for your ads to give a clear picture of the results a consumer will
actually get.”

I’ll be adding more Automated Wealth Package red flags over the next couple of days. Feel free to ask any questions below or put other red flags that you’ve noticed yourself.

If You're Struggling To Make Money Online - Click Here And FINALLY Get Answers To All Of Your Questions About Making Money Online

Blogging to the Bank review by Eagle Research & Associates

Note: I have received a notice from YouTube about videos on this page:

“We have disabled the following material as a result of a third-party notification from Rob Benwell claiming that this material is infringing”

YouTube automatically took the videos down and this post wouldn’t make any sense anymore without the videos. I was going to look into the specific allegation, but it turns out that I won’t need to…

New Blogging To The Bank Warning At Eagle Research Associates

I’ve just been notified that Eagle Research Associates, Inc. has posted a warning about Blogging To The Bank here:

Click Here For The Blogging To The Bank Warning At Eagle Research Associates

Eagle Research Associates is a non-profit organization run by Lynn Edgington who works with an Assigned Federal Agent from the Secret Service, Assigned U.S. Postal Inspectors, along with other U.S. & Non-U.S.  law enforcement agencies he isn’t allowed to disclose at this time.

Other warnings:

If You're Struggling To Make Money Online - Click Here And FINALLY Get Answers To All Of Your Questions About Making Money Online